I just don't feel the descriptions given fit who I am. I also think people are more complex then a group of characteristics set into 12 different groups. I mean I am open to the idea that what stars we are born under may effect parts of use.

However some people really take star signs seriously and think that when they are born really shapes who they are. I just don't believe that.

Plus I think people forget their almost flawed origins, of the idea was thought up when they thought the Earth was the centre of the solar system. I mean I get that some people born at a certain time may more likely have certain traits and hence where the base idea came from. Since I think nature and maybe even a bigger picture can have an influence on us. Since the science behind the myths behind full moons are really interesting.

However there is nothing like that for horoscopes at all, and I am not keen on that either.

Since well we are made from mostly water, so it can be possible that is why the moon can effect us. However there was science that looked into figures and found out that casino's did pay out more money on a full moon. So people are a little bit luckier. People do go a bit crazy on a full moon and more disorderly and similar arrests are made then. There is a few other things, like more women will give birth on a full moon.

Since in modern day, we have figures for these kind of things we can actually look at it on a huge scale as well.

Which is why I am open to the idea that there might be something there. However it is a kind of maybe-ish. However not everyone will get those traits, or are less likely to get those traits. If that makes sense?