Well as I've mentioned to others unfortunately that's not really a matter of us being able to enforce our opinions but more so complying with contemporary standards of US society so as to avoid potential issues with lawsuits or someone attempting to police us. While you or I may agree that we don't have any sort of issues with breasts or see them as taboo, a large portion of US society does, specifically when it comes to them being viewed by minors without proper parental guidance or adult supervision.

I do think however that at least in terms of the language we've come up with to replace what we had, we've found a means of getting our rules across in a responsible manner.

If you'd like to talk this further please message me personally and I'd be happy to answer any questions you have.

I bring up the forum post because the forums have proven to be a great way for us to keep track of and reference back to suggestions. The issue being discussed there is but one of the issues being currently brought up in that thread. We've asked in thread there already to see if our users have suggestions for phrasing, and tossing ideas around/seeing what people like that's suggested helps in our decision making as well as refining ideas into something that is communally decided to help rectify an issue as opposed to having a bunch of splintered conversations on multiple pages and someone's ideas possibly being left out.

Now in regards to your example with the robot, that's already taken care of by what we wrote based on the exact phrasing we used. "...organs which represent or imitate the traditional biological representation." The key phrase there being "represent or imitate" which doesn't require a biological organism to be sporting them, just that we can clearly see that say, someone drew an anthropomorphized car and drew the headlights on the character's chest to made them look like breasts with defined areolas/nipples. That would be a representation/imitation of what is seen as a female breast and therefore would be subject to the Mature 18+ rating.

Now your more anatomical suggestion for phrasing could be a way to go. Unfortunately, it may fall under the same issue with us just stating "areola/nipple/breast" in that people find that too vague or broad. While yes, I'd say that most people get the hint that "breast" as a term is referring specifically to female anatomy as you suggest, unfortunately there are those people who either need the rule spelled out for them in meticulous fashion because they're going simply by the word, or argue that we're moderating unfairly because we never mentioned anything about female breasts specifically.

Of course the reason we do that and why I brought up to you the issues of taking a social stand on this issue is that in most communities in the US, including Delaware, a man at the beach, on the basketball court, what have you with his shirt off isn't considered unacceptable. Movies, television shows, video games, novel covers, comics, etc all tend to run under this same principle, which we in turn also do. Now is it arbitrary? That's certainly up for debate and I tend to be on the side of not really caring all that much about someone walking topless down the street on my way to work. However the all or nothing approach you seem to be suggesting with your "A" suggestion of "all nipples must be covered" would easily alienate several more people as opposed to fixing an issue.

Your B suggestion appears to just mean get rid of the clarification asterisk and just leave it at "female breast" which is a possibility of course. I'll certainly relay this and your other posts and see if we can't use these things to improve the documents.