To me it means not identifying anywhere in the male-female spectrum. i still consider myself to have a gender, but not one that's easily named or described within the limitations of the English language.

Socially it can be interesting. i do present somewhat masculine, if metrosexual/effeminately so. i prefer to be called sir and mister over ma'am and ms or even mx; i like being chivalrous (in a non-demeaning fashion; i'm equally chivalrous to all genders); i wear men's clothing (mostly, i do like the occasional skirt or leggings, but who's to say that's not manly?). People don't usually expect to interact with an agendered person, so it's just easier to give cues for them to interact with me as a masculine one. Doesn't always work though, i'm pre-anything and look quite feminine. The best i can usually hope for is 'assume i'm a butch', which is mostly okay with me too, though i wouldn't want to co-opt that title for myself since i am not one.

Hope that answers your question!

To improve the lives of others around you, through self-betterment, exploration of your environment, and striving to fight injustice where it can be found, and celebrating the pleasant things when they happen, no matter how small.

It happens almost constantly. Usually i just wince and carry on; if it's a friend that does it, i correct them (gently). Unfortunately right now i just Look Like A Lady so i get treated as one more often than not. It is upsetting sometimes, at which point i usually go home and try to destress.

i still have little babby political views from just starting to discover what my own thoughts on things are, but i'll do my best.

i prefer a combination of representative and pure democracy, having grown up in Canada. i think true pure democracy risks having a loud majority oppressing a minority's needs; i think pure representative democracy has a tendency for corruption (though all representation forms risk this, really). i really like the minority gov't aspect of Canada's system; the vote of no confidence thing tends to keep politicians in line really well.

i think the issue is probably more with the people in power and the system in place than it is with the size of the state. After all, in theory, a larger state means more representatives, so it should scale up well.

i'm still undecided on economics. It's really hard to find a perfect system; there really isn't one.

It's totally okay! It's something i want to think about more myself.

Googling gives no answer. However, cheetahs become effective hunters around 3 years of age, so i'm going to say young cheetahs cannot go as fast as adult ones.

Since for the speed of a cheetah the length of its legs and their power as well as the length of its strides is most important, a cub or an adolescent is not as fast as a full-grown, adult animal. In cases of comparison of adult cheetahs to one another - the stronger the legs, the longer the legs, the more flexible the spine, the bigger the lung and heart volume, the faster the cheetah.

To me, it's about getting to be an object while still being animate, sapient, etc. i have a lot of issues with personhood and considering myself a person; i don't identify with the majority of humanity but neither do i identify with having an 'animal spirit' or anything like that because a) i'm not very spiritual and b) i think such things can sometimes tread close to being appropriative of other cultures when a white person claims it. Pretending to be a robot just makes sense to me, i can objectify myself in a safe and respectful manner (sapient robots deserve rights, feelings, consideration etc just like a person would) and disconnect from the parts of humanity that put me off.

As for the wider appeal, i think it might be somewhat similar. The idea of being able to objectify someone without actually taking away their rights or freedoms (or taking them away in a kinky way as desired) has a certain appeal, i think. Also, there are a lot of drawing/writing/idea possibilities for robots that aren't as available, realistically, to standard human or furry characters (such as disassembly, programming, uploading/downloading data directly, hive minds, etc). There's also the aesthetic appeal; some people just prefer a mechanical or technical look over an organic one. Robots also have the option to be single-purpose characters; for example, my bartending robot Dave was made for a single function (though he's since decided he'd rather do other things). In such a way they can be even further objectified (such as in the case of sex dolls), again without necessarily removing the person-like qualities of the character.

Hope that answers your question!

42 is the answer. The question and the answer may not be known at the same time or this universe will cease to exist and be replaced with a another, more bizarre one. This may have already happened.