This is half joking, half serious. Joking, because I thought it was funny, and I wanted to make my own variation of the image, and serious because I've seen this my entire childhood, so much so that when I was a small child, I legitimately thought wolves looked like they did in western cartoons because I was very young and I wasn't yet familiar with the outside world, so of course when I saw wolves at the zoo for the first time, all I could think was, "but... these are just dogs; there's no way an animal that looks like that could be a wolf!" and then I thought the zoo was cruel for keeping huskies confined in cages, because dogs are domesticated? Then again, I don't think wild animals belong in cages either, and I think rehabilitating the rescued young and releasing them later down the line would be better than putting them on display in an enclosed space that's only 5% the size of their natural habitat. In the end, I found out that they were, in fact, wolves, and the animals I saw in these cartoons were heavily exaggerated, and there's a few reasons why. For old cartoons specifically, the caricatures had deliberately exaggerated anatomical features to make them appear "ugly", and the cartoons themselves existed to essentially "prove" that wolves really are dumb, man-eating vicious beasts that thoughtlessly kill everything in front of them and attack humans completely unprovoked, so people wouldn't want to sympathize with them, and therefore be completely fine with them being hunted and persecuted, often to extinction. Obviously, wolves weren't the first predatory animals to get this treatment, tigers did, lions did, bears did, hell, even humans did as we can see with those old, racist cartoons.