indenfensible referential by pleistabix

indenfensible referential

pleistabix

3 February 2014 at 21:24:00 MST

A better look at the "magician" attire that I awkwardly expanded this image yet further eastward to incorporate

A few months newer reference, for I fear(ed) that the other one, though a more interesting composition, was too wordy and did not fixate on whatever my point was, so that I needed to explain too much when trying to arrange for someone else to draw the creature, and then this one ended up being just as wordy! And then later I put more words on it! It seemed like anytime I failed to say not to do something that really bothered me, someone did it.

Two of these pictures are lifted from other images. One of them I have posted here and the other I have not gotten to, which is newer than the other three here. Can you guess which? I will wager you can but do not see any need to.

I enjoy the two awkward disembodied legs on the right in the preview.

Should I be uploading these as "characters?" Or is that primarily for people who did not take the hassle of making one of getting one of these dumb references made before this website existed?

Submission Information

Views:
795
Comments:
10
Favorites:
4
Rating:
General
Category:
Visual / Digital

Comments

  • Link

    I've got a question.

    • Link

      Please ask it! I guarantee you I have more answers than you could ever need.

      • Link

        Since she is part plant dose that mean her anatomical germ cells are in a flower or grass part in her hair? (Definition of germ cells https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_cell )
        If her germ cells are just plant parts in the hair, than that would explain why no pants are needed, unless it's instead because of being discrete bodied like Sonic characters like Sally Acorn.

        • Link

          It is probably more like your second suggestion because the other creatures in this gallery dress the same way!

          • Link

            I see. I just saw possible aspects of being a plant.

            • Link

              Perhaps they are all secretly plants.

              • Link

                The possibilities are endless. Though I'm pretty sure Sally Acorn and others like her are probably just clothed in fur, scales, or some kind of smooth discrete skin.

                • Link

                  I can only speak for the ones that I have drawn.

                  • Link

                    Yep, I just thinking your dragon, gecko, and mammal characters like this one https://www.weasyl.com/submission/698860/keat-your-hands-to-yourself are a little like Sonic characters. The possibilities are still endless, just one possibility seemed more likely than the other.

                    • Link

                      That and the gecko creature are actually other people's characters! Although I think the gecko has been orphaned by the owner.
                      From my observation, Sonic characters' heads are way too big for their bodies, and they tend to be clothed or naked. I like the shirt-and-shoes-sans-trousers aesthetic, but I do not let my technique be dictated by anyone else's arbitrary rules. Especially since trouserlessness seems to have largely gone out of style with sonic junk-enthusiasts.