One reason I haven't had much to post is due to the caveats in some pursuits, writing-wise, and when trying to make one or more points.

I don't like the idea of trying to amount to anyone's "hero" or, more extremely, "savior". It takes only so much knowledge to know that the most prolific of persons go to great lengths to keep the less so inspiring entailments of their lives completely unmentioned, and that's where I encounter an issue that pisses me off to no end.

There's monikers, and then there's one or more benefactors. There's names, and then there's the people behind them, along with all of their worshippers who deem anything outside of their sphere of interest "boring" and not worth their time, because that's how most people are anymore. I simply resolve to distance myself from such people, who are most often found wherever there's a supposed "beacon of change". Sounds a lot like American presidencies, doesn't it?

If you're not 'selectively blind' then you should know that there are people in this world who, on top of possibly not having an abundance of time to subscribe to the shenanigans of others, may also be victims of various physical or mental ailments that only make life harder. Not everyone has the time nor resources to pour into what amounts to railing against the wind, and the vast majority of them are well aware of the logical fallacies present in the supposed 'agendas' of those who make such time.

If all the rampant usurpation isn't, to anyone, any indication of people's inherent bigotry then they are simply blind.

Minimalism for the win.