I really like the detail on this -- the depth of field, how the characters really pop from the palette of their environment, and how consistent the perspective is. I'm re-realizing how if you want something to appear vivid and accurate, you can omit contour lines except where to imply lighting, like you do here.
I see the treasure }:3? (At first glance I thought they were playing Pokemon Go...)
One note: your tags got a little... broken. I believe Weasyl supports tags with multiple words, I just don't know how. In any case , you probably didn't mean to tag this with "and", "in" and "the".
Link
Stoatshine
I really like the detail on this -- the depth of field, how the characters really pop from the palette of their environment, and how consistent the perspective is. I'm re-realizing how if you want something to appear vivid and accurate, you can omit contour lines except where to imply lighting, like you do here.
I see the treasure }:3? (At first glance I thought they were playing Pokemon Go...)
One note: your tags got a little... broken. I believe Weasyl supports tags with multiple words, I just don't know how. In any case , you probably didn't mean to tag this with "and", "in" and "the".