I get it people, you're all obsessed with being some lone survivor in a wasteland because you're fantasies are quite violent, but this blind devotion to the company that is making the game is hilarious to me.

Fallout 3, Fallout: New Vegas and Skyrim, different genre it may have been, were broken games with multiple problems. The PS3 version of Skyrim, for example, would just crash whenever it felt like it and bloat your save to hilarious proportions along the way. Even to this day, the game isn't working like it should have been at launch. "But hey!" Bethesda apologists will say "At least you can play it now!" Sure, I can do that, years later.

The Bethesda Fallout games were no better, New Vegas being the only fairly stable version I played...a hilarious thing considering it was developed by a different company (Obsidian) using Bethesda's own tech.

What I'm saying here is that slobbering all over Fallout 4 before it launches and claiming it's game of the year because you watched some dude in Australia play the game for ten minutes can't turn back all the nonsense that Bethesda has put me and a bunch of other people through. You''l think I'm being dramatic, I know. That's fine, but when you pick up FO4 only for it to crash on you multiple times or any other collection of expected Bethesda oddities, don't say I didn't warn you.

I'm hoping I'm wrong, I really am, but past experiences lead me to think otherwise. Enjoy your AAA-Developed, Early Access Survival Game everyone!

On a related note, I'd suggest staying away from Star Wars: Battlefront for the same reason, but no one is going to listen to me on that either: Such is the draw of a played out license.