Sign In

Close
Forgot your password? No account yet?

Rhona in Red by LordDominic

Rhona in Red

LordDominic

2017 art.

Rhona in lingerie.

Submission Information

Views:
235
Comments:
11
Favorites:
4
Rating:
General
Category:
Visual / Digital

Comments

  • Link

    Very sexy lady and she knows it! You draw that vibe so well and again the right side of SFW - not that I would look at this at work you understand. The background really works but is that Angelo's pillow should his boyfriend be concerned?

    • Link

      Thank you very much! In all honesty I'm actually quite a prude it seems, I'm actually sort of put off by NSFW stuff. Guess that means I'll have to keep it safe for most audiences, then!

      As for that pillow, I just realized, they both have pink pillows! That was totally unintentional. Maybe there was a sale at Walmart or something.

      Her and Angelo would actually make a kinda cute couple since she's like a foot taller than he is, but I have actually been considering that she's in a relationship with either fat army officer wolf Nikolai, or scrawny little Rollo. On the one hand, two fat wolves that almost look made for each other. On the other hand, interesting contrast between the large and in charge Rhona, and timid and twiggy Rollo. Decisions, decisions...

  • Link

    I tend to agree, I have nothing against sexually explicit art but you do see it taken to extremes that personally I am uncomfortable with. To each his own I suppose, there is even a term for being turned on by cartoons schediaphilia, that's just a little creepy. Still I suppose I have plenty of kinks of my own without worrying about other peoples.

    • Link

      As it turns out, I was correct in my suspicions that I am actually asexual, after talking it over with some people it turns out what I experience isn't all that uncommon--I find certain shapes and proportions and such attractive (there are things I find attractive in both sexes, so for a while I thought I was bisexual), but once The Bits come out, or it would be time to act on that attraction, my mojo level drops to zero or even into negative values! I think this explains a lot of why I draw what I draw, and why I keep it at the level I do, so long as the undies stay on those chunky dog butts, I'm fine.

      Oversharing? Maybe. If so, I apologize.

      Anyways, I had to look up that word, "schediaphilia". It's kind of odd to me because it seems like a lot of the sort of cartoon characters I see people being attracted to are depictions of traditionally attractive characters anyways. I guess I fail to see it as any different than looking at some Renaissance painting of some thicc lady and finding that attractive--it's a stylized artistic depiction that probably meets one's personal aesthetic tastes, and perhaps in the media the character's personality also matches what one finds appealing in that regard, and the fact that it's a drawing or painting isn't the primary appeal.

      Thanks for introducing me to that term, though, as it's given me something interesting to do some light research into.

  • Link

    Not over sharing, I think it might be difficult to over share about being asexual but that might be my lack of understanding. When I first started looking at art about a year ago I was surprised at the level of back story people develop particularly with people like your self where it does not become a direct part of the published content. I would of assumed from the LGBT content of your work that you were part of that community but I now realize that I cannot make those assumptions, not that there is any relevance to quality of an artists work and their sexuality. Gay people do appear to be over represented in creative areas of life but I have always put that down to the massive amount of time, energy and resources that raising children takes and heterosexuals being more likely to have families. I once worked at a company where a colleague got married and was told if you decide to have children you will not be promoted for this very reason.

    I agree there is no difference in seeing the attractiveness in a cartoon or a renaissance painting although for me neither are sexually arousing but pleasantly reminiscent of situations which are, I also understand the falling mojo (great word) although not to the extreme you describe I have always found the stage you depict here far more exciting than when the bits come out. Rhona is one very sassy lady, I still prefer Lucifer Dominicus draw whatever conclusions you like.

    • Link

      My thoughts on the prevalence of LGBT content in art in general is that art is all about self-expression, and for a myriad of reasons it's not always possible to express that aspect of oneself in real life. I think it's even more common in furry art since the community as a whole seems more accepting of sexuality in all its forms, for better and for worse.
      Your hypothesis about the investment of time and energy does certainly hold merit as well--one of my art friends elsewhere has expressed to me that with a family to take care of, he has very little time for art. Meanwhile, I'm not trying to pursue any sort of family or relationships of any sort, giving me even more time.

      As for your assumptions... I'm not offended in the least. I think it's down to me simply loving to design characters and their worlds, and some of those characters just happen to be openly gay or bi. I guess it's harder to depict a character as "openly straight" since that's still the biological "norm" so to speak, but I'd say the majority of my characters are heterosexual, or perhaps asexual--I have a few characters that are canonically married, a few that have even had children, single parents with children, and characters that I see hooking up as their stories progress. I think my preference to just draw single-character art just makes who is with who a bit unclear at times. A guy with a single earring and rainbow undies thrusting his butt in the air is clearly saying something about his sexuality, but a gal just hanging out at the beach in a swimsuit probably isn't.

      If I try to give it some thought, I think your interest in Dominicus might be the same reason I like drawing him--beyond finding his shape and visual appearance aesthetically appealing and some of his features "exotic", he has a certain energy to him--he's confident, and dominant, and has a sort of "primal" or "animalistic" quality to him as well. I can certainly see where one might find that sort of personality and "swagger" appealing in its own right, regardless of the body that personality is housed in--but if that body also matches your tastes, it's just double the fun.

  • Link

    I find the depth of the back stories people create really interesting, it appears to me that the better the art the more likely there is to be an evolved story. I'd like to understand if that is a necessary correlation and you need to feel the personality of the character to fully represent them, but there are a few issues with the whole statement. Firstly as a non artist I am defining the quality of the art based on what I like, not the most qualified or unbiased opinion and secondly it could be just that artistically creative people are also prone to create in other ways.

    Could I also ask, would you define your art as furry or anthropomorphic, a mixture of the two or don't you make that distinction?

    Keep up the good work and thanks again for sharing it I get a lot of enjoyment looking through your folders.

    • Link

      I kinda think it's different for every artist, for me at least it's very inconsistent--a lot of the work I think turns out the best often features a one-off design or idea that I just want to draw without any additional context. Sometimes a story evolves as I draw, since parts of my brain are free to think about the character and their stories as I draw them. Meanwhile, a lot of my art of established characters just feels boring and repetitive at times. However, a more developed character with an established (or at the very least, developing) story gives me some sort of direction to go with art of them and that sort of focus or direction can really help. If you're at all familiar with the Dungeons and Dragons way of defining moral alignment, I'd say my creative approach is "Chaotic Neutral", and very frustrating to truly pin down and define.
      This question frustrated me a bit, if I'm being honest, but it made me think.

      If you have any other artists you chat with regularly, I'd suggest you ask them the same question as well, since I'm pretty sure they'd answer differently.

      Also, honestly? I draw "cartoon animals", or at least that's how I describe what I do. I don't really know what the distinction between "anthro" and "furry" really is, to be able to make such a distinction myself. I think "anthro" is more the general style/genre of "people that look like animals" while "furry" has more to do with the fandom? The two seem to be used interchangeably, yet also have distinct definitions, and I've seen some pretty heated debates between various schools of thought.

      Overall, I think it's hard to really define any of these things, since it's all subjective, and every artist (and every viewer) has different thoughts and opinions and views.

      (Oh, by the way, it's possible to reply to my replies, you don't need to post a new comment every time.)

      • Link

        Sorry - on all 3 counts

        • Link

          I hope I didn't give the impression that I was angry or anything, if I did, I'm sorry as well.

          I thought I worded my first point fairly well, but I can see where that could be read as a bit "angry" or "frustrated"--especially since I did say it was a frustrating question! I wasn't bothered by it, though--it made me think. My response to that is my honest response, though, it's inconsistent for me whether or not a developed character will get "better" art since it's a bit of a yin and yang thing--more development means more direction, but with that comes restriction, whereas some new one-off design offers freedom, but little direction or focus beyond what I start with. My mind wanders when I do these one-off things and their character develops as I draw, sometimes at least. Other variables like my moods and whether or not I feel like the drawing is going well or there's more of a "sunk cost" mindset going--finishing and posting something mediocre for the sake of having content to post, and maybe being able to do something with it based on feedback I get or ideas I have after I think about it some more.

          I would still suggest asking other artists you might chat with to see what they say about that question, or any of the other more general questions you've asked me really, because I'm sure it's a bit different for every artist and they'll have different perspectives.

          I wasn't insulted or anything by being asked if I draw more "anthro" or "furry", I was just giving my honest answer there as well, I think of them as "cartoon animals" more than being intentionally drawn to be "anthro" or "furry"--and I'm not 100% sure where they lie because I don't really understand the distinction between the two terms, only that I have seen some pretty heated debates on the subject in the past and I think it just works better for me to just say "hey, I'm drawing silly cartoon animals in silly underwear, I know what I'm doing isn't some sort of high art". I know both terms do describe what I'm doing pretty well, though, so I tag all of my art with "anthro", "furry", and "cartoon". I guess the way I use these terms myself is, "anthro" refers to anthropomorphic characters, "furry" seems to refer more to the fandom or audience, and "cartoon" is the general style and attitude of what I'm doing--the term "cartoon" implies stylized designs I suppose.
          I guess the liberal use of quotation marks kinda gave a sort of sarcastic or snide feel to that response in hindsight, though.

          As for the "reply vs comment" thing... that's just me being finicky, I guess. It's a minor nitpick but I find it a bit easier to follow a conversation if it's all one thread. I wasn't annoyed or anything, but wondering if maybe you didn't know that was possible for some reason, perhaps other sites not allowing replies to replies for ???? reason, or like how you can't reply to comments made on your profile pages on FA and have to go to that person's page to leave a reply, so you wind up with this weird hodgepodge of out-of-context comments and replies.

          I've enjoyed chatting with you so far, but wonder if what little "insight" I have to offer answers your questions sometimes--when it comes down to it, I am just some guy doodling cartoon animals for fun, and coming up with stories and worlds for them, but I'm just some (mostly) self-taught hobbyist doodling in my spare time.

  • Link

    It's a good point about the guy in the rainbow undies verses the girl on the beach, if you wish your target audience to know you are in someway different from the assumed norm you have to advertise, whatever that difference might be