I feel like I've hit some sort of furry drama landmark with this. I should make myself a badge to commemorate the occasion. In any case, this is the latest in a fairly long string of FA admins being dicks, so no surprise there.
Maybe it's time for some Weasyl-exclusive content.
I posted a name-redacted screenshot of some random dick being a dick and calling me a "mental case" after I refused to humor his invasive interest in trans people as a "do not do this" object lesson.
I saw that screenshot. That did not at all violate any rules....you didn't say any names. That's such garbage.
As far as I know, redaction of names is sufficient. I've seen plenty of people posting notes or whatever on call-out journals and the like who have had no trouble. My guess is that they just don't like me.
I've definitely seen the same thing many times over. That's pretty petty of them if they did this because they don't like you. If it's any consolation, I like seeing your stuff over here on Weasyl.
It is, yeah! I try to post to as many sites as I can. The downer is that FA is the largest market so artists who work on commission can't really leave if they want to sustain a business model.
I hear ya there! I'm still trying to build up a viewer base to hopefully get more business. I'm at less than 25 watchers on this site despite consistent postings. I hope their stupid suspension doesn't last too long so you don't lose income over such nonsense.
'Leaving' (cutting off one site entirely) isn't really a good idea anyway, as much as preferentially using one site over another, slowly bringing people to the idea that if they want a commission somewhere, they go to site X, not Y.
It's like:
For example, you could post to Weasyl several hours or a day before anywhere else, so people know to see your stuff there 'first'.
I once wrote up a journal on the general subject. Have a look if you're interested.
My guess would be that it's a mix of my fairly open disgust of staff and site and being trans that triggered it, personally, since I have had problems with staff on those grounds before. But you may be on to something.
In any case, I think you should just wipe your hands clean from that filthy website. I cut loose almost a year ago and it feels pretty good. The only downside to Weasyl is that it just doesn't have nearly as many people (which could also be a good thing, considering the etiquette of the general furry population), but it's infinitely better in design and functionality.
Stop wasting your time on that shit site! As the great O. W. Kenobi once said, "You'll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."
Of course I can only speak for myself, but while I have vastly fewer followers, comments, and favorites than I did on FA, I get way more serious commission inquiries (as opposed to "will you draw my character for free if I promote you in my gallery? EXPOSURE!"), so hopefully this won't hurt your sales much.
Fair warning, Weasyl has the same idiotic "No call-outs!" rule, but so far I haven't noticed them enforcing it specifically to silence victims of abuse/harassment, so at least there's that, I guess.
The following is a personal view on the issue in general, not official comment about or on behalf of any site!
Fair warning, Weasyl has the same idiotic "No call-outs!" rule, but so far I haven't noticed them enforcing it specifically to silence victims of abuse/harassment, so at least there's that, I guess.
The problem for people staffing websites is that there's no stance that won't get them roasted by various sections of the community.
The idea that a site should allow such things to be aired if they're the truth has a fatal flaw. It relies on moderators and administrators to determine what is truthful when there is no way for them to reliably do so - at best they can take educated guesses. So you end up with one of three basic scenarios:
Yes, scenario 1 above will suck in some situations, but at least nobody gets preferential treatment. Scenarios 2 and 3 are worse for the overwhelming majority of users.
And all this without getting in to the quagmire that is defamation law across international borders (and the jurisdiction in which a site is hosted has nothing to do with it - did you know you can be sued under Australian defamation law simply because your material is accessible in Australia, regardless of where it is hosted?).
(Note: This view is based on a decade of moderating large forums, as well as stints moderating both FA and WZL)
To reiterate - this is a personal view, not official comment!
Probably BlickFen doesn't want me throwing down on this topic in his unrelated journal so I'll restrain myself to one statement: as someone who has also moderated high-traffic forums, I am deeply skeptical about the long-term benefits of undercutting any community's ability to self-police, especially in cases where no legal action is possible (or warranted). Management and micromanagement are very different things, often mistaken for each other.
This is a personal view, not an official statement!
That's a pretty wicked thing to do to an artist. What an abuse of power.
If it's any consolation, Weasyl's growing at a decent pace though. It got its one millionth submission in about the same amount of time it took FA to get its one millionth, without any of the advantage of being the only real option available FA had back in the day. Hopefully this place will be a hospitable alternative to commissioning artists sooner than later.
You show up as a (Member) when I check your page. Perhaps it got undone? Either way, shitty that it happened at all, dude :\
Link
ManedWolfTorben
You're account was suspended there? Pardon my language, but what the hell for?!?