Sign In
Close
Confused and Angry by TristanAlexander
OK, I have just had a ton of my work removed, most of it had NO genitalia of any kind showing and at leats ONE was NOT NUDE at all! I liked this site but now it looks like I will have to give up on it. I am very confused about WHY my work is being targetted and taken down!
Confused and Angry
Journal Information
- Views:
- 362
- Comments:
- 23
- Favorites:
- 0
- Rating:
- General
Comments
-
-
And here I was impressed that weasyl seemed open-minded.
before long, it'll be illegal to draw clothed minors in ordinary situations. wonder how messed up those children will grow up.
-
They just pulled the pieces with no notches or anything?
-
Now I got an answer back saying several of those I pointed out had NO genitalia showing were put back up. They still have at least 3 pictures they say are minors with genitalia showing that I am disputing, since the figures are NOT minors! Guppy, Son of Atlan and Cats Companion (which has NO genitalia showing anyway)
-
Erring on the side of caution for the viewer . . .
Unfortunately the err usually manifests in the artist feeling like they’ve been run over ruff shod.Glad some of them have made it back so far.
-
-
well that's just lovely :/ I didn't see anything wrong with anything you had up
-
http://vampyre-nmp.blogspot.com/2012/04/missed-valantene.html This is one that was removed...no genitalia showing, not a child...why?
-
It kinda looks like a child to me, and it is showing his bottom... I know that you didn't mean it in a provocative manner in the slightest, but its kinda in that grey area, and they were just erring on the side of caution. I'm glad that you got some of the other ones put back up though! ^_^
-
Aw come on! I’ve seen cherubs on candy boxes that looked more provocative than that!
-
-
http://www.nabyn.com/art/jessan-and-ouras-40681 so why was this one taken down? And others that showed nothing?
-
Stupidity?
I’m sorry T’, I have to be flippant with that one or I’d put my fist through a rather pricey 30” computer display.
Correct me if I’m wrong but he’s clothed!?-
Yes he is clothed!
-
* rolls eyes *
* throws hands up in the air *
* barely catches mouse before it hits the floor *New site or not, I don’t give a flying f*** if the founder get’s pissed off at me forever.
!THAT’S IDIOTIC!b]![/b] -
The typo gremlin is not kind to me . . .
!THAT’S IDIOTIC**!**
Common, laugh, the timing of the typo was funny.
-
-
-
BTW, I like the intensity of the piece.
Bough rider and mound imply a common focus. -
- mount -
-
-
Well I guess I am leaving here too... I joined because they looked open, but now it seems they are nothing but Bigots..like what we like or get out..I choose to get out
-
They replaced alot (but not all) of my stuff, so I will stay on for a while longer. I will however worry more about what I post! Hope you donlt give up to quickly on them!
-
I think I am giving up on them, i do not care if they replaced ALL of them or MOST of them, I freaking ATE the people who are "holier then though" hey it's completely OK to show bondage, rape, my god were FLOODED in homosexuality...but your going to show a young fictional being enjoying physical pleasure..my god you PERV! I came here because I THOUGHT these yahoo's were going to be OPEN...all they are is hipocritical asses that force artists to post art for them..if they don't like it..artist go away.
So no I am pissed they even DID any of that
-
-
Link
TristanAlexander
The rules do not say NO pictures of children of any kind!! That is what they have decided to remove! And several were NOT children but they decided arbitrarily that they looked young I guess! Very Very upsetting!